Tag: society & society

Decide dolphins in North Rhine-Westphalia elections? -Ask WDSF below we publish the results of opinions of the NRW-parties and politicians on the subject of animal protection on the occasion of the NRW Landtag election on May 9th, 2010, and the controversial Dolphinariums in Duisburg and Munster NRW parties were asked by the whale and dolphin protection forum (WDSF) opinion on the continued existence of the two Dolphinariums in Duisburg and Munster. Another request by April 13, 2010 took place directly on the animal welfare policy spokesman of the parties. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from University of Cambridge. The NRW-parties of CDU and FDP obtained so far no position to this letter. Thus arises following whale recommendation of the WDSF (justification s.a. schemes): CDU – do not choose – disqualified! FDP – choose non – disqualified! Not pick SPD – – disqualified! Bundnis90 / Die Grunen choose the left – – choose party human environment animal welfare (welfare party) – buer – select on the topic of animal welfare has also “Albert Schweitzer Foundation for our environment” asked the parties to North Rhine-Westphalia: Albert-schweitzer-stiftung.de /…You can see the responses of the parties represented in the Parliament at a glance welfare Landtag nrw 2010 here. WDSF Note: The CDU and the FDP in North Rhine-Westphalia have with their statements for the categorical retention of Dolphinariums in Duisburg and Munster disqualified for the North Rhine-Westphalia State election on May 9, 2010. Voting against Dolphinariums: the left, odp and human environment animal welfare (welfare party).

The Greens in North Rhine-Westphalia have created a year “on ice” the issue of the closure of Dolphinariums, intensively to be very concerned and examine a closure. The Bundestag group of the Greens in favour of years Dolphinariums. We hope that the Greens in North Rhine-Westphalia, if necessary together with newly elected Landtag groups of other parties, are the driving force, closing the Dolphinariums in North Rhine-Westphalia. Svenja Schulze from Munster, Germany (North Rhine-Westphalia SPD Bundestag group) said the WDSF although willingness to talk on the subject of Dolphinariums to, however would be an immediate closure of Dolphinariums for SPD Bundestag group out of the question, especially since “The Dolphinariums would meet the requirements of a serious attitude of the Dolphin” (s.a. the letter below). Anm.WDSF: Alone the delicacy in the Allwetterzoo Munster is located with its swimming pool size of 10 x 20 meters and its wooden barracks far from a “reputable Dolphin attitude” – here seems wrong local patriotism when Ms.

Schulze to play a role! Continue to Ms Schulze opposite the WDSF said that the termination of the Dolphin position Federal thing is – this is wrong, as well as Mrs. Rawert (MdB, SPD) confirmed in Berlin (see MdB Mechthild Rawert (SPD) on the WDSF event in Berlin. The respective State laws that can change only the State Government (in North Rhine-Westphalia the landscape Act, which allows the captivity of dolphins in zoos for alleged reasons of education) are applicable. “Albert Schweitzer Foundation for our environment”: the responses of some Parties not (yet?) in the Landtag in the overview are submitted.

It the idea is imposed, that the legislature would like to steal from the responsibility for the children and reduce his workload, in which he simply unchecked leaves the care of the mother, but provides enormous obstacles for every non-connubial father. It has lawmakers right, if he has the responsibility, because this is actually at the parents, but stop at two. Thus, the only correct approach would be “you have a child together, so get together and ensures a good solution, because it has forced you to none to witness the child.”: “The well-being of the child begins before its birth.” Still has to be considered: the family courts are overloaded. The proposed “request”solution and Thus automatically to extraordinarily more lawsuits than automatic common concern from birth lead “Conflict resolution”, because this sets the rule exception relationship in favour of the sole concern. Ongoing and existing regulation of 1671 BGB to the transmission of alone concern – that is totally sufficient – it comes to trial – only in the/exceptions of event of a dispute and court proceedings should only as “ultima ratio” come to the course. Common concern from birth is thus also in the meaning of subsidiarity of the basic law, while this is not the case with the application or conflict solution. Ohio Senator may find it difficult to be quoted properly. We believe: in principle both parents should be equated.

Only in exceptional cases can and should consider whether a sole custody would be useful. But also here father and mother must be equated. The latter is only when the situation is on an equal footing. And it is this the first step is to respect the father and mother, what they are, namely father and mother Child. As simple as this also sounds, it seems to be so difficult.

But right here you can’t let anyone out of his responsibility. Footnote: 1) source: BVerfG, 1 BvR 420/09 of the 21.7.2010, paragraph No. (1-78),… Contact: Anja Paulmann Thilo Muhlberger under… is the opinion also online. There, she is available for download as a PDF file. Self-help group PAS Rhein/Main